Overblog
Follow this blog Administration + Create my blog
October 31 2010 7 31 /10 /October /2010 16:28

The campaign kicked off in 1966, though live hare coursing had been practised in Ireland since the British army at the Curragh, County KIldare, introduced it to our country in 1813. It was always a horribly cruel "sport", involving as it does setting pairs of trained and often "blooded" greyhounds in pursuit of hares in wire-enclosed parks or fields.

 

In 1966, the Irish Council Against Bloodsports was founded with the aim of securing a ban on hare coursing and other bloodsports in Ireland. It lobbied politicians and picketed coursing events and in 1976 presented a petition against hare coursing containing 100,000 signatures, at the time the largest petition in the history of the State.

 

The petition was ignored by the government of the day. The same government enacted into law that year a Wildlife Act that, instead of offering additional protection to the Irish Hare, strengthened the legality of hare coursing.

 

In 1984, a cross-party parliamentary committee debated a motion from one of its members calling a ban on hare coursing. Though the committee receiced more than 4,500 letters from the public of which only THREE supported hare coursing, the motion was defeated by nine votes to six. (the breakdown was: All six Fianna Fail members voted against, Fine Gael split three-three, and the three Labour members voted for the motion.

 

In 1993, Independent member of parliament Tony Gregory tabled a Private members Bill aimed at banning hare coursing. Despite commanding the support of the vast majority of the Irish people, the Bill was defeated by 104 votes to 16.

 

Though defeated, the Bill generated intense public and political debate and the government responded to the concern about the cruelty of hare coursing by enacted new rules requiring that greyhounds be muzzled at hare coursing events.

 

Muzzling, unfortunately, has not eliminated cruelty from hare coursing, as the pictures on this blog demonstrate. The dogs continue to maul, strike, or otherwise injure the terrified hares and literally toss the frail creatures into the air like rag dolls.

 

Hares released back into the wild after coursing often die within hours or days of a condition called stress myopathy. The ordeal has simply been too much for them.

 

The campaign to protect the Irish Hare from this chamber of horrors that is park coursing continues. All the animal protection/welfare/rights groups want it banned.

 

The Irish Coursing Club, the umbrella body for the country's coursing clubs, is facing an uncertain future. A property developer two years ago sued it for alleged breach of contract over a land deal. The ICC lost the case and on January 18th 2011 the Commercial Court in Dublin will decide on the extent of the damages to be award against it.

 

We in the anti-hare coursing lobby are unsure as to how this upcoming situation will impact on our campaign to end hare coursing. Time will tell.  We just wish to see this gentle creature protected from one of the most evil bloodsports ever devised by man.

 

John Fitzgerald jfitzg3@eircom.net

 

 

 

Share this post
Repost0
October 31 2010 7 31 /10 /October /2010 13:45

ghc-01 
Hare Coursing

Share this post
Repost0
October 31 2010 7 31 /10 /October /2010 13:44

ghc-16 

Further evidence of cruelty in hare coursing

Share this post
Repost0
October 31 2010 7 31 /10 /October /2010 13:41

ghc-06 
A hare in the jaws of two greyhounds at an Irish hare coursing event

Share this post
Repost0
October 31 2010 7 31 /10 /October /2010 01:01

Dear Editor,

 

The National Parks and Wildlife Service deserves immense credit for its dedication to conserving the Corncrake. The cost of the project might seem exorbitant at around 400,000 Euro spent last year, but this has to be set against the implications of losing this much loved bird that is a prized part of our culture and eco-system.

   In times past, the distinctive and then familiar call of the Corncrake heralded the arrival of summer. The bird was for generations a welcome dweller in hay meadows nationwide. Now just 133 of these cherished avian singers remain to grace our natural environment. Shortage of cover due to intensive farming is the main threat to its survival, but I fear that a cynical attitude to wildlife conservation grounded in ignorance may hasten its demise. Public awareness campaigns are essential to promote an understanding and appreciation of our wildlife heritage.

  Another native species that is threatened, though not as severely as the Corncrake, is the Irish Hare. It is in full retreat from modern agriculture, especially the mono-cultural swathes of grass and cereals that decimate its habitat. Once growth falls below a height of about 25 to 30 centimeters it is of no use to the hare. This level of cover represents a virtual desert to the animal. And the wholesale removal or destruction of hedges adds to its predicament.

  Coupled with this challenge, the species faces the annual netting of around 7000 hares for coursing. The problem here is not the actual number of hares killed outright at coursing events, but the effects of Capture Myopathy, a stress-related condition to which a number of wild mammal species, including hares, are susceptible. Hares may die at any stage of their ordeal, from the moment they are snatched from their natural habitats and held captive for weeks, right up to the day they are subjected to the terror of live baiting in the parks, or after the coursing events, when the animals (excluding those killed or visibly injured by the greyhounds) are released back into the wild.

  The NPWS concedes that the species is under pressure. In its submission to the Convention on Biological Diversity last May, it declared that the Irish Hare is "experiencing pressure from loss of suitable habitat and consequently its status is considered poor". Another NPWS document stresses the need to ascertain the "reproductive viability of hares post-coursing and the impact on local population demographics of hare removal and return".

  Now is the time to put in place a comprehensive scheme for the protection of the Irish Hare. The cooperation of farmers and other landowners would need to be enlisted to restrict activities that lead to erosion or destruction of habitat. A ban on hare coursing would cost nothing to the Exchequer.

If we fail to address the plight of the Irish Hare, this iconic creature could, some day, become as rare a sight in our countryside as the treasured Corncrake.

 

Thanking you,

Sincerely,

John Fitzgerald

(Campaign for the Abolition

Of Cruel Sports)

Share this post
Repost0
October 31 2010 7 31 /10 /October /2010 00:48

Circular sent by the Campaign for the Abolition of Cruel Sports (CACS) to All members of Ireland's national parliament, the Dail, re the future of hare coursing in Ireland:

 

Campaign for the Abolition of Cruel Sports

Lower Coyne Street, Callan, Co. Kilkenny

Phone: (056) 7725543

October 26th 2010

 

Re: The future of the Irish Coursing Club and the cruel practice it endorses

 

Dear Deputy,

We draw your attention to an upcoming court case that could impact on the future of the Irish Coursing Club, the umbrella body for Ireland’s cruel hare-coursing clubs.

This case could wipe out the ICC’s finances, and the concern of CACS and other groups involved in promoting higher standards of animal welfare in Ireland is that the government might come under pressure from elements within the greyhound industry, and/or the influential pro-blood sports lobby, to lend financial assistance to the ICC.

The case of Greenband Investments v the Irish Coursing Club is due to be heard in the Commercial Court, Dublin, on Tuesday, January 18th 2011.

The background to the case is thus: Limerick-based property developers, Greenband Investments, are suing the Irish Coursing Club for 5.2 million euro plus interest, claiming that the ICC reneged on an agreement to sell a right of way on land adjoining its head office in Clonmel, County Tipperary. The property developer believed it had a binding contract with the ICC to sell a vital strip of land that it required for a planned 31m Euro retail development.

The ICC denied that it had agreed to sell the piece of land and Greenband then claimed that the ICC had revoked a legally binding contract.

Last year, Greenband won the first round of its court battle with the ICC. The judgement delivered by Justice Frank Clark can be read on the Irish legal website Courts.ie.

The next stage of the case will be for the Commercial Court to decide on the extent of the damages to be awarded against the ICC. 

We are aware that the Irish Coursing Club is already in deep financial trouble and that a substantial damages award against it in January could topple it completely. Such an outcome would, we predict, enhance the status of Ireland’s persecuted hare population. It would be enormously beneficial to the endangered Irish Hare, under pressure from modern agricultural practises as well as from the activities of the coursing clubs affiliated to the ICC.

Aside from its role in overseeing the many public exhibitions of hare-coursing at venues nationwide, the ICC is the body that all greyhounds must be registered with before being eligible to enter in either coursing or track racing events. Its main source of income is the money raised from registration fees.

The ICC has long been a negative and debilitating influence within the greyhound industry, tainting the image of the entire industry with its support for a cruel blood sport that is, according to professional opinion polls, loathed by the vast majority of the Irish people.

While not commenting in any way on the legal rights or wrongs of the case before the Commercial Court concerning the ICC and Greenband, we are concerned at the possibility that if the organisation is effectively toppled as a result of the court case, the pro-blood sport lobby and diehard coursing elements within the greyhound industry will press for State funding or some kind of financial bail-out.

We implore all TDs and Senators not to countenance any financial assistance whatsoever to the ICC, unless and until it commits itself to replacing the use of live hares with the humane alternative of drag coursing.

We believe that this is a reasonable condition to impose on the organisation, as coursing clubs in other countries, including Britain and Australia, successfully diverted to the drag version after live coursing was banned by their parliaments.

We ask you not to capitulate to pressure from any source aimed at salvaging the ICC in the event of its financial demise unless it explicitly renounces the use of live hares in coursing and gives a clear commitment that all affiliated coursing clubs will switch to drag coursing within a specified time period.

Following are three pieces of footage that you might care to have a look at in this context. We maintain that the introduction of drag coursing to Ireland to replace the horrific cruelty to hares that currently passes for “sport” will benefit both the hares and the greyhound industry itself.

 

1.      A brief film of live hare coursing as practiced today in Ireland with muzzled greyhounds: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D58qbzC-GI4

 

2.      Photographic evidence of cruelty in hare coursing. All pictures taken at muzzled hare coursing events in Ireland: http://www.flickr.com/photos/icabs/sets/72157624180875760/

 

3.    A brief film promoting drag coursing: It proves that this humane alternative replicates all the fun and excitement of coursing- without the cruelty: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=429C65F8B84B0783

 

Thanking you for your kind attention,

Sincerely,

John Fitzgerald,

PRO,

Campaign for the Abolition

Of Cruel Sports

 

 

                                                          

 

 

Article on commenmcement of new hare coursing season: 

 

The hare coursing season commences on September 26th. Thousands of hares will be rounded up by gangs of men and boys and snatched from their peaceful homes in the countryside. Following a period of “training”, the helpless and terrified captives will then be forced to run from pairs of greyhounds. Some will die, either from being struck forcibly by the larger and faster dogs, or from stress-related ailments arising from their unnatural captivity or the chase itself. We have no way of know what becomes of the hares released after being coursed, though we do know that hares subjected to high stress levels may die within days of the experience.

 

What makes the upcoming season all the more objectionable is the fact that information elicited under FOI has revealed a litany of breaches of the legally binding conditions attached to the license under which hares are netted for this “sport”. Technically, the Minister for the Environment has the power to revoke or amend the netting license if he is presented with evidence of widespread violations of the license conditions in the previous coursing season.

 

License breaches found to have occurred in the 2009-2010 season include the netting of hares by coursing clubs without the permission of the landowners, the removal of sick hares from the wild for coursing, failure to release hares by the specified time after coursing events, and failure by clubs to return coursed hares to their original habitats.

 

One club is revealed to have detained its consignment of captured hares for six weeks after its coursing event to use at another fixture. Hares were re-coursed at a number of venues, another breach of the netting license.

 

We would contend that these violations add up to a very strong case for revoking the hare netting license this year. Apart from these blatant examples of coursing clubs ignoring or flouting the pathetic set of rules designed to make hare coursing less inhumane, there is a conservationist argument against allowing another baiting season: The National Parks and Wildlife Service admits on its website that the Irish Hare is a species under threat.

 

In its official submission to the Convention on Biological Diversity last May, the NPWS declared that the Irish Hare is "experiencing pressure from loss of suitable habitat and consequently its status is considered poor".

 

Minister Gormley could greatly enhance the status of this beleaguered creature by calling a halt to hare coursing. It is a relic of the dark ages and the damning spectre of cruelty hangs over it.

                                                                                                                                                     

Thanking you,

Yours sincerely,

John Fitzgerald

(Campaign for the Abolition

Of Cruel Sports)

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                    

 

 

 

Share this post
Repost0
October 31 2010 7 31 /10 /October /2010 00:42

This automated message is the first article of your blog. It will help you get started with OverBlog. You can edit or delete it by going to the "Publish" section of your administration page.

Hope you'll enjoy blogging with us!

The OverBlog team

PS: In order to log in to your administration panel go to OverBlog portal.

Share this post
Repost0